Thanks for that John. 😉
Ok I'll have to admit I've seen this a few times, but never in use. Forgive my newbie ignorance here but why would you want a chuck in the tail stock? What does this offer you as a turner that a live center can't do?Not a live centre in the same sense as the above posts, but for some jobs a chuck mounted on a live centre in the tailstock is what is needed. One of mine has a mini chuck on it for finer work. Used with a drawbar through the tailstock they can also be used in tension, which works well with very long thin spindles...
Nope, good question. I’ve seen them before but wondered about specific use.Ok I'll have to admit I've seen this a few times, but never in use. Forgive my newbie ignorance here but why would you want a chuck in the tail stock? What does this offer you as a turner that a live center can't do?
I don't know all the uses people would have.but why would you want a chuck in the tail stock? What does this offer you as a turner that a live center can't do?
Basically any time you want to turn a piece around and feel you'll loose accuracy if you remove it from the chuck.Ok I'll have to admit I've seen this a few times, but never in use. Forgive my newbie ignorance here but why would you want a chuck in the tail stock? What does this offer you as a turner that a live center can't do?
Ok I'll have to admit I've seen this a few times, but never in use. Forgive my newbie ignorance here but why would you want a chuck in the tail stock? What does this offer you as a turner that a live center can't do?
heard people suggesting fastening the second chuck to the other end of something and spinning both but I can't imagine a situation where I would do that.
They're not really meant for turning a piece under power - certainly not at high speed
Help me out here. See Bill's chart above, the #2 taper option, column K. Does the degree-minutes-seconds shown here mean the same thing as the #2 taper shown in this chart (below) I posted in another thread, column Angle From Center, in decimal form? Two methods of representing the same information?The latest version of the Nova looks pretty good. Looking on the website I found out the nose taper for the inserts is also 2MT which is clever.
My OneWay has a small taper in the nose but I’ve no idea what it is, is there a 0MT?
Edit: There is indeed.
View attachment 70999
Yes. One is in metric, your is imperial. They should be the same but I didnt check any conversions. I’m sure there is a deg:min:sec to decimal converter online.Help me out here. See Bill's chart above, the #2 taper option, column K. Does the degree-minutes-seconds shown here mean the same thing as the #2 taper shown in this chart (below) I posted in another thread, column Angle From Center, in decimal form? Two methods of representing the same information?
View attachment 71077
I didn't check but could easily calculate.Does the degree-minutes-seconds shown here mean the same thing as the #2 taper shown in this chart (below) I posted in another thread, column Angle From Center, in decimal form?
My old LaBlond Regal metal lathe has a taper cutting attachment that will move the y axis while the X axis is feeding. The unit can be set in either degrees or taper per foot, but the settings are not capable of the required accuracy.Of course, if machining a taper from metal you'd have to work differently - tapers are often machined by offsetting the tailstock horizontally - they are made for that and even have an offset scale. Then there is CNC...
My old LaBlond Regal metal lathe has a taper cutting attachment that will move the y axis while the X axis is feeding. The unit can be set in either degrees or taper per foot, but the settings are not capable of the required accuracy.
Thanks for sharing, and while you may see a better way now, for this particular scenario - you've also opened eyes to an alternative method which might be just the ticket in a different scenario. The idea of the nail in the oneway live center to fix it, is something to file away. May not ever need it, but then again, maybe there is a need.<snip>
And now, today's moment of humility.
5:00am, the alarm clock goes off.
5:00:03, first thought of the day- I don't wanna go to work today.
5:00:10, second thought of the day- hey dummy, why did you make it so hard on yourself forming that stupid piece of wood? Next time, turn the cylinder first using normal methods, with nice, squared ends and a reference mark for drilling, then walk it over to the drill press and poke the holes into it for the nut. There was no need to lock out the live center and try to use it as a drive to shape a square block of wood with an epoxied nut stuck into it. Come on, you know better! Dummy. (Insert head slap here.)
Epilogue- I don't mind confessing my mistakes in a public forum. Over my lifetime I've learned many a valuable lesson by watching the mistakes of others. I figure that if I made the mistake, there could be at least one other person out there, someday, on the verge of making the same mistake, and maybe I'll be their learning example.
I usually (well, actually not "usually" but "if I remember") will turn a tenon around the outside of the nut so I can re-mount the block in a chuck to change the profile.There was no need to lock out the live center and try to use it as a drive to shape a square block of wood with an epoxied nut stuck into it.
The idea of the nail in the oneway live center to fix it, is something to file away.
I've also found it useful to align two parts for gluing/re-assembly - like I've parted a piece in two with a tenon on each end, and after turning on the inside, I want to re-assemble them.
The method I use for thin spindles needs nothing but the live center (I like the steb live centers for this), and no aids but hand support needed. Keeping mind "thin" is relative, to illustrate my technique I made these, tapered from about 1/2" to 1/16" over 24" or so.
That's interesting.There is a lot of spindle turning in old style spinning wheels!
Assuming you can use a drawbar with your tailstock, AND you remember to gradually and slowly turn down the speed to stop the rotation AND remember to do the same to turn it back on - the weight/torque of the chuck will twist and break any thin spindles. And since that is not the way most people turn the lathe off I'm sure muscle memory / forgetfulness (?) will break many spindles. Do you have any secrets or tips in that regard?But, I primarily use it to put long thin spindles under tension. The one on the left is a 1/8" (3mm) diameter over about 12" turned down length.
I have recently used my freewheeling chuck in the tailstock to turn a few drum sticks as a favour for a friend and found that worked quite well for me.
Sorry @Neil S - I didn't read far enough down on your message before writing my response.Assuming you can use a drawbar with your tailstock, AND you remember to gradually and slowly turn down the speed to stop the rotation AND remember to do the same to turn it back on - the weight/torque of the chuck will twist and break any thin spindles. And since that is not the way most people turn the lathe off I'm sure muscle memory / forgetfulness (?) will break many spindles. Do you have any secrets or tips in that regard?
For most things like wands or drumsticks or reasonable-length goblet stems it isn't necessary, although we know that too much pressure from the tailstock will cause bowing and whipping. Tension is just the extreme of "less pressure".and still can't imagine what value the tension adds.
It can add to the problem but is not the cause.although we know that too much pressure from the tailstock will cause bowing and whipping
I had a couple of very inexpensive live centers when I began turning and have seen but not used any number of others. Finally purchased the Teknatool version on sale and have never considered anything else. I find it accurate and keep the two starter versions around as 'just in case' tools. IMO...Having used them all, for a period of time it looks, which would suggest a new turner get? They all seem to have a lot of flexibility, just that the Nova isn't threaded directly. Is this the case?
Long term I can see the utility of having both the Nova and one of the others, but could I get good performance with just the Nova to start? Tooling dollars are tight starting out, but getting quality tooling should help learning.
Gregory
The skeptic in me wonders, tongue-in-cheek, if the double chuck might be a solution in search of a problem.
And, if you are not having problems then why try to fix or improve on it!
Sorry @Neil S - I didn't read far enough down on your message before writing my response.
However, turning off the power at the wall to allow for free spinning seems to be a very inefficient method.
If addressed to me, yes, don't have problems so I'm not trying fix or improve anything. I'm simply trying to understand the physical and practical methods people have used or tried to use tension for thin spindles. The steps listed seem like a lot of trouble.
And I still don't understand how a drawbar can be used in a tailstock. Did I miss something? None of my tailstocks (PM and Jet) have a through hole for a drawbar - do some tailstocks have a hole all the way through the lead screw big enough for a typical threaded drawbar (such as we use in headstocks to hold Jacob chucks, MT collets, and various mandrels?) Drawbars in these parts are typically 3/8"-16 or 1/4"-20 allthread.
My Axminster lathe has a hole in the tailstock. Not sure of the exact size but it will accept an M10 draw bar.And I still don't understand how a drawbar can be used in a tailstock. Did I miss something? None of my tailstocks (PM and Jet) have a through hole for a drawbar - do some tailstocks have a hole all the way through the lead screw big enough for a typical threaded drawbar (such as we use in headstocks to hold Jacob chucks, MT collets, and various mandrels?) Drawbars in these parts are typically 3/8"-16 or 1/4"-20 allthread.
The problem with the draw bar in the tailstock is that it will tighten as soon as you extend the ram, therefore to do what you want to do would require positioning it first then tighten the draw bar.My Axminster lathe has a hole in the tailstock. Not sure of the exact size but it will accept an M10 draw bar.
I thought all wood turning lathes had this feature for long hold boring but obviously not.
I have an earlier version of this lathe.
View attachment 71244