@Doug Freeman all good points. And, you’re probably right that if you’re not considering the upper echelon, there are endless examples of poorly turned forms that have been attempted to be saved with carving (or by adding beads and coves for that matter). And I also agree that piercing generally requires more technical thin-turning skills than carving.
One good example where carving necessitates solid turning skills is Dixie Biggs’ relief carved hollowforms. I watched a video recently where she described her process. She required a consistent 1/4” thickness, because her relief carving was 1/8” - 3/16” deep, and the extra 1/16” was her safety net. If her thickness was inconsistent she would cut through her wall. The point was that she was preserving the excellent form she achieved on the lathe. She also focused on retaining high spots so that her carved from still hd the original turned shape in profile. Interesting stuff!
Even though we might not agree on everything, I really like these kinds of discussions. I think they’re part of what makes the forum interesting, and it’s fun to get into the academic minutiae.
One good example where carving necessitates solid turning skills is Dixie Biggs’ relief carved hollowforms. I watched a video recently where she described her process. She required a consistent 1/4” thickness, because her relief carving was 1/8” - 3/16” deep, and the extra 1/16” was her safety net. If her thickness was inconsistent she would cut through her wall. The point was that she was preserving the excellent form she achieved on the lathe. She also focused on retaining high spots so that her carved from still hd the original turned shape in profile. Interesting stuff!
Even though we might not agree on everything, I really like these kinds of discussions. I think they’re part of what makes the forum interesting, and it’s fun to get into the academic minutiae.