Doug, where would an inquisitive person find the ford cup spec?
I can interpret this question numerous ways, but I take as being with regards to the ford cup spec for a given finish. There are 2 types of cups, a ford and a zahn. The zahn is more of a calibrated lab device, and expensive. The ford is a much less costly alternative and there are conversion charts. Some finish mfrs will quote a cup viscosity, and Target Coatings does, for the zahn cup.
What is important is for the sprayer to develop familiarity and a reference with how their gun sprays various viscosity finishes, what range of viscosity a tip/needle will spray well. When trying a new finish, check viscosity and compare to past experience. Take lots of notes to build your reference base. Different guns will vary a bit, especially due to different air cap designs. Some gun mfrs will have reference charts for tip/needle combinations vs viscosity.
I'm spraying Target Coatings EM6000 acrylic lacquer. I think my problem, up some further research, is that my spray gun only has a .6 mm nozzle. If I got one that was .8 mm that would almost double the volume of lacquer being sprayed.
I think you are on the right track, but......water based finishes are a different animal to spray vs solvent based, and much of it due to viscosity and surface tension within the finish. Solvent finishes (at least the kind we mess with, higher end stuff my be different) be thinned a huge amount as necessary to get them to spray and still perform after curing. WB finishes have limits on thinning - too much thinning gets in the way of the coalescing that happens after they are laid down. Due to the nature of the WB finishes they tend to be harder to atomize vs solvent. Surface tension plays a role in this.
Also, we are all different and have different expectations. What one person says is fine or good may be unacceptable to someone else. When one says "I use xyz to spray abc and it works great" may not be acceptable for another. The reverse is also true, some may demand perfection beyond what others believe is necessary. In the end we each eventually find a "happy" level we accept - and not just with spray finishing.
I have sprayed quite a bit of Target EM6000 and EM9000, more flatwork than turnings. I tried cheap box store guns with limited success. I stepped up to an Asturo detail gun, and had a lot more success but still not to my satisfaction. I then stepped up to a CA Tech CPR-G gun, and had great success. Going through these steps allowed me to experience the difference proper design and development make. The ability of the CPR gun/cap to atomize WB finishes at reasonable pressure, and the effect on how the finish laid down, vs the others was quite dramatic. All of these guns could be made to spray solvent finishes acceptably (the Asturo does very well with them) but not WB.
I am not aware of a <$100 gun that will spray WB acceptably, but I may be more discriminating. I recommend you email, or better yet, call Jeff Weiss, owner and chief chemist of Target Coatings. It's been a few years but Jeff was always willing to answer emails and discuss things over the phone. I suggest you spend some time to dig through Target's website and forum, both new and old, to gain some knowledge before contacting Jeff.
I don't use WB finishes on turnings anymore. They do a lot of things well, but one thing they suck at is enhancing the chatoyance of wood - by themselves they just look dead. There are work arounds, most notably using shellac as an undercoat. Solvent lacquer does a wonderful job of enhancing chatoyance, sprays easily with about any gun, with some knowledge about retarders can be sprayed with less temperature/humidity restrictions, rubs out/polishes easily, accepts dyes for toners, and I don't have to use multiple finishes etc. When I want a fully filled high gloss finish for turnings, it's my choice. I know it's a long response to seemingly simple questions, but they aren't really simple questions. Finishing is a skill all its own, and requires time and effort to be good at it.