Administrator, Moderator, Webmaster
First off before you ban me I'm trying to be positive.
Is Al correct in his definition of how the forums runs? Is there no way for members to formally appeal decisions that might be well meant but seem to be more as an Idi Amin type dictatorship than a benevolent one? I understand your jobs are hard so my question is at what point is there anything that can be done when it appears there has been a movement from neutral to over the line?
If the roles the three of you play are to be absolute "dictators" and approved by the BOD then so be it. Although I would like to see a public acknowledgment of this from Tom. At this point the BOD has the complete say and any dissent will need to be handled on other boards.
First off before you ban me I'm trying to be positive.
Is Al correct in his definition of how the forums runs? Is there no way for members to formally appeal decisions that might be well meant but seem to be more as an Idi Amin type dictatorship than a benevolent one? I understand your jobs are hard so my question is at what point is there anything that can be done when it appears there has been a movement from neutral to over the line?
If the roles the three of you play are to be absolute "dictators" and approved by the BOD then so be it. Although I would like to see a public acknowledgment of this from Tom. At this point the BOD has the complete say and any dissent will need to be handled on other boards.