• January Turning Challenge: Thin-Stemmed Something! (click here for details)
  • Conversations are now Direct Messages (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Scott Gordon for "Orb Ligneus" being selected as Turning of the Week for January 20, 2025 (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

Asking for help with camera choice

DSLR's: Can change lenses, can get f/2 lenses (large aperture), allowing for composition with shallow depth-of-field
  • Full size, such as Nikon D7200 or Canon 80D
    • Pros: Outstanding low light performance.
    • Cons: $$$$, size, weight, $$$ of accessories
  • APS-C, such as Canon T6 bundle ($750 at Costco, $600 after rebate, before tax, comes with 2 lenses etc.) If I were in the market for a DSLR, that's probably what I would buy today.
    • Pros: Good low light performance, but not as good as the full size sensor
    • Cons: Still somewhat $, size & weight still big
Micro 4/3: Can change lenses, can obtain f/2 lenses, full manual control, just like DSLR's, but smaller & lighter
  • Slightly less expensive than APS-C, but not significantly less expensive
  • Theoretically, any Micro 4/3 lens from any manufacturer should fit another manufacturer's micro 4/3 body

Point-and-shoots:
  • Few of them have manual control or ability to shoot RAW format. Low light performance, extended dynamic range (HDR) modes are typically not as good as Micro 4/3 or DSLR's.
  • A lot fewer $.
  • Lower weight, greater portability, etc. May need a better lighting setup for studio photograph of wood items.

I personally own:
  • 6 or 7 year old Panasonic Lumix ZS-3 point-and-shoot. Lovely zoom range, great portable travel camera. I'll probably give to one of my children.
  • Bought-used Canon T3 DSLR (APS-C). Primarily for another hobby. I'll pick up a telephoto for that camera. I'm primarily interested in low-light performance, the T3 is only 12MP, but that's good because each pixel is larger, and can collect more light.
  • Just bought Olympus Stylus Tough TG-4 point-and-shoot. Has HDR, a macro mode that's really amazing, and shoots RAW. Waterproof to 50 ft, freeze proof, presumably drop-on-the-floor-from-less-than-7ft proof (don't intend to test that!!!). Vacation camera; might use as wood shop studio camera.
Why shoot RAW? If you want to color correct, RAW is easier to color balance than JPEGS.

Why HDR? Studio shots span a large variation in brightnesses. HDR retains contrast from dark to bright, especially if shot with a tripod. Details in shadows are preserved without blowing out lighter-colored elements in the photo.

Hope that helps!
 
DSLR's: Can change lenses, can get f/2 lenses (large aperture), allowing for composition with shallow depth-of-field
  • Full size, such as Nikon D7200 or Canon 80D
  • APS-C, such as Canon T6 bundle

Hy,
The D7200 is a crop-sensor camera (excellent by the way - as a D7100 user); the full-frame Nikons are the D500 - D810 range + the D3, 4, and $6000 D5.
 
Back
Top