• April 2025 Turning Challenge: Turn an Egg! (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Kelly Shaw winner of the March 2025 Turning Challenge (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Ellen Starr for "Lotus Temple" being selected as Turning of the Week for 21 April, 2025 (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

AAW 2023 Symposium POP Exhibition Theme

Michael Anderson

Super Moderator
Staff member
TOTW Team
Joined
Aug 22, 2022
Messages
1,829
Likes
5,969
Location
Chattanooga, TN
Hi all. Now that the Professional Outreach Program Exhibition theme has gone public, I’m curious to hear everyone’s thoughts. Does the theme spark creativity? Are you planning to submit an entry for jury? If you haven’t read yet, the theme is Form | Content. Here is an explanation:

Form and content refer to two distinct but essential and interwoven aspects of an object: form is the composition, techniques used, medium, color, pattern; content is what the form communicates or evokes: subject matter, meaning, concept, feelings.

As a theme, Form | Content offers many different possibilities: from statements on pure craft (the form is the full meaning or purpose), to thinking about how we use wood, shape, texture, color, surface design, etc. to convey meaning beyond function and beyond. As a play on words, ‘content’ can also refer to the state of being content, or to the contents of a container, since turners are often vessel makers and vessels hold content(s). The theme makes space for all forms of turning.


I feel like this theme is very open to interpretation, which is sort of alluded to in the “possibility” statement. Just about anything can apply to the theme. I suppose this is a good thing though, as I’m excited to see the variety of pieces exhibited. The artist statements will (or should) likely be very important. I wonder how much the statement is considered during judging?

Anyway, I’m going to try to submit three entries, though I’m not expecting to be chosen—having seen the immense talent at the Chattanooga symposium’s gallery…wow! That said, being selected as an exhibitor isn’t really the most important thing. The challenge to make three pieces of a certain caliber is what I’m excited about. All of my submissions will test my skills and allow me to grow as a turner. Cheers!
 
Last edited:
I thought that was only for POP members?
From the call for entry page

Eligibility/application details

  • The juried portion of the show is open to any AAW member and to full-time students in art, design, or industry-related degree programs, regardless of membership status.
  • Application Period: December 1, 2022, to January 15, 2023
  • All types of turnings are welcome: sculptural, functional, segmented, ornamental, green-turned, etc.
  • All entries must include turning, but any material may be used.
  • Work, as it will be displayed, must fit into the area of a 6" cube. No exceptions.
  • Up to three works may be entered. Only one piece per artist will be exhibited, if chosen.
  • Entry fee: $25 for up to three submissions. Fee is waived for full-time students in art, design, or industry-related degree programs.
  • A theme statement of no more than 100 words is required.
 
I feel like this theme is very open to interpretation, which is sort of alluded to in the “possibility” statement. Just about anything can apply to the theme. I suppose this is a good thing though, as I’m excited to see the variety of pieces exhibited. The artist statements will (or should) likely be very important. I wonder how much the statement is considered during judging?

Yes, the idea of the theme is to leave it open to interpretation. The artist will be asked to include an artist's statement relating the submitted object(s) to the theme, but that's all. I presume the judges at least read the statements, but I don't think they are a factor in the selection process.
 
Hi all. Real quick follow-up question (that doesn’t really deserve its own thread). I’m planning to submit three piece to be juried, and am just finishing the first one. Is it appropriate to post images of the pieces publicly prior to the selection process? For example, in the gallery here. I’m slightly embarrassed asking this; however I’m new to this process and would appreciate the guidance.
 
I don't see any problem with it, I suppose it would depend on the gallery's jury rules. when I got juried into local artisan co-op, I had to submit photos (this was during pandemic rules and all that) so I simply used my facebook album, which was already public. Never crossed my mind for an instant a Jury might require new, fresh and un-exhibited work never seen by anyone before...


(Edit: Oh.. .I didn't even notice the title of the original thread...... didn't realize it was about AAW stuff... but still I think same opinion applies...)
 
Hi all. Real quick follow-up question (that doesn’t really deserve its own thread). I’m planning to submit three piece to be juried, and am just finishing the first one. Is it appropriate to post images of the pieces publicly prior to the selection process? For example, in the gallery here. I’m slightly embarrassed asking this; however I’m new to this process and would appreciate the guidance.
I would reach out to Tib Shaw with these questions. I know that if the “rules” noted in the call are not followed, that may impact whether the piece is even considered for acceptance or not. Good luck Michael!
 
The judging is supposed to be blind. Since at least one of the judges will be a woodturner, there is a chance your work could be "seen" before the competition. No idea if this would matter, but you could always wait till after the competition to post.
 
I don't see any problem with it, I suppose it would depend on the gallery's jury rules.
For sure. This was stated one way or another in the submission call, so I wasn’t sure. Especially given that at least one of the judges will be a woodturner, and may or may not be active here or elsewhere, I didn’t know if seeing the piece beforehand would taint the process.

I would reach out to Tib Shaw with these questions. I know that if the “rules” noted in the call are not followed, that may impact whether the piece is even considered for acceptance or not. Good luck Michael!
Thanks Russ! Accepted or not, the most beneficial part (to me) is trying to make something that could possibly be “good enough”. Ha! I know it’s way more nuanced than that, but whatever. :) Good call with @Tib G Shaw

The judging is supposed to be blind. Since at least one of the judges will be a woodturner, there is a chance your work could be "seen" before the competition. No idea if this would matter, but you could always wait till after the competition to post.
Fair points. I could certainly wait, but then I would miss out on the instant internet-fueled dopamine hit. I’m just joking :) I just think it’s fun to post to the gallery, and the positive and constructive feedback is something I can immediately use to help shape future pieces..
 
Last edited:
Good Luck, it's good experience to shoot for the fences, check out pieces chosen.
 
Yes national symposium is awesome, cannot see everything, sometimes just find quiet place and breathe.
 
Jumping in a little late here. We don't regulate when people can post work. Identifying information is stripped from the materials I provide the jury, but there is a possibility that a juror might know who a work is by. We instruct and trust the jurors to set any outside knowledge aside, and to evaluate the work entirely by its merits. Hope that helps!
 
Back
Top