Donna Banfield
TOTW Team
I have a question regarding the use of the following three finishes (sprayed): Lacquer, spray acrylic, Krylon Fixative (trade name). [This question has been cross-posted on two other turning forums that I visit].
I am an oil finishes user for all my woodturnings, but some of my work that is highly carved or detailed, oil finishes are not possible - impossible to get the excess out of the tiny crevasses. I have used spray lacquer and spray acrylic, several coats. I recall that some of you have used Krylon Fixative (Andi Wolfe, for one) on some of the carved and painted pieces, and am wondering about the reasons.
One reason for lacquer is that the successive coats 'blend or melt into the previous coats. That would be a plus if I were doing hollow forms like Joe Landon or Andy DiPeitro, where that deep luster enhances the appearance. But the type of carving/texturing on my work would not benefit from that luster or Chatoyance. The cons for using lacquer are also numerous - finicky to apply depending on temperature and relative humidity; need of a well-ventilated area in which to spray the finish, and in the winter, where I'm heating my studio in New Hampshire with a pellet stove, open flames are a very bad idea around lacquer.
So that brings me to spray acrylics in the rattle can. They don't see to be as sensitive to heat and humidity, and don't have the same problem with respect to fumes (correct me if I am wrong here, please). They cost more, but the trade off might be worth it? I'm also concerned about the 'flexibility' of acrylics compared to lacquer. Will I see the acrylic finish krackle over time as the wood expands/contracts as it reacts to the changes in weather, temperature and seasons? Is lacquer more flexible a finish allowing for these unavoidable issues?
Any insight that anyone with experience has on these issues would be greatly appreciated.
I am an oil finishes user for all my woodturnings, but some of my work that is highly carved or detailed, oil finishes are not possible - impossible to get the excess out of the tiny crevasses. I have used spray lacquer and spray acrylic, several coats. I recall that some of you have used Krylon Fixative (Andi Wolfe, for one) on some of the carved and painted pieces, and am wondering about the reasons.
One reason for lacquer is that the successive coats 'blend or melt into the previous coats. That would be a plus if I were doing hollow forms like Joe Landon or Andy DiPeitro, where that deep luster enhances the appearance. But the type of carving/texturing on my work would not benefit from that luster or Chatoyance. The cons for using lacquer are also numerous - finicky to apply depending on temperature and relative humidity; need of a well-ventilated area in which to spray the finish, and in the winter, where I'm heating my studio in New Hampshire with a pellet stove, open flames are a very bad idea around lacquer.
So that brings me to spray acrylics in the rattle can. They don't see to be as sensitive to heat and humidity, and don't have the same problem with respect to fumes (correct me if I am wrong here, please). They cost more, but the trade off might be worth it? I'm also concerned about the 'flexibility' of acrylics compared to lacquer. Will I see the acrylic finish krackle over time as the wood expands/contracts as it reacts to the changes in weather, temperature and seasons? Is lacquer more flexible a finish allowing for these unavoidable issues?
Any insight that anyone with experience has on these issues would be greatly appreciated.