hopefully, you dohopefully it survives.
Not trying to be obtuse. Doug is correct - a large mesquite sphere.
The tree was in Karnes County, a bit east of the King Ranch. It weighs a bit over 1000-lbs and, right now, is about 36" diameter.
As of right now, the lathe mod is done and a little walnut test log (26", 350-lbs) is on to find the Achilles heel(s). If nothing breaks or presents problems, the mesquite log goes on tomorrow.
Mistletoe-burl is special stuff just as mesquite is special stuff - there are minimal ring-shakes. My biggest concern is nails or screws - the tree was in the front yard of the ranch house - who knows what lurks beneath. I can deal with 16-penny - lag screws are challenging.
I've attached a pic - hopefully it survives.
I had to look up swale2" swale created when the tractor dropped it from a height of about four feet.
I had to look up swale
Bill, the second step is taking off the bed and putting it in your front yard.
Next to the tire flower planter.
😀
And don't forget to add the black plastic for pool linerBill, the second step is taking off the bed and putting it in your front yard.
Next to the tire flower planter.
😀
Pic: Day-3a - third day - able to see Northern Hemisphere. It's easier now - I'm mostly past the chainsaw flats on all but the middle 8".
Next is finding the optimum axis - don't want to cut too much into one side before engaging the other. Mistletoe burl needs to be balanced with similar ratios of finished to negative space which requires adjusting the axis on the drive, the live-center or both. Only then can the tenon for the faceplate be surfaced and the faceplate attached.
After axis comes the equator. Currently I'm about 42" between centers - best guess is the circumference will be 30" to 31". Need to bring in one or both poles to achieve a globe.
Fortunately mesquite has a 3.2% radial and 1.6% tangential shrinkage factor which means I can cut to almost finished dimensions on the first pass - when dry, it should only need minor tweeking. I did a 18" walnut globe a couple of years ago - had to plan for 7.8% tangential shrinkage / 5.5% radial shrinkage - recutting at 6% MC got a bit dicey.