Mitch,
Never did that one. Personal preference is for a shear cut rather than a scraping cut. It doesn't seem to make any difference in how fine of a burr you have, negative rake, burnished, straight from the grinder, or whatever. Shear (cutting edge at 45 degree angle to the rotation) always seems to cut cleaner than a scraping (cutting edge held flat or 90 degrees to the rotation) cut. Scraping cuts do tend to pull more than shear cuts. You can get away with a scraping cut better on harder, denser woods than you can on the softer ones, and most of my woods I turn are in the softer category, like cherry, big leaf maple, walnut. We don't have sugar maple here (#*&%#!), and most of the Eastern trees that grow here grow very fast due to a wet mild climate: a 30 year old sycamore/plane, silver maple, or elm tree is 30 inches in diameter. Riding my scraper across the bottom is just about like having half of a gouge going across, and gently riding the bevel. A very clean cut. Note, I use a swept back to the left grind, also called an 'inside' scraper, and am cutting with the down side almost on the tip of the scraper. I don't like to use a round nose scraper for this because you will be cutting at or above the center line or the tool/.blade, and this causes a leverage problem, and if you catch, it will slam down flat, and dig some big holes. This is like when using a skew, you cut on the lower portion of the skew, not on the upper portion.
robo hippy