I think that weighing the wood is much more practical and far less costly than an expensive moisture meter.
I'll have to agree with Bill on this.....with some clarification.
I've been using the exact same Lignomat pinned moisture meter as Al Hockenberry for about 20 years. What I've found is the hand held unit is great for getting an initial MC (moisture content) reading. From there, you can come up with a "game plan" for roughing and drying a bowl block. It is important to understand that not all bowl blocks, and roughouts will require the same techniques in seasoning to stabilization.
The trouble with using the moisture meter throughout the seasoning process, is that you only know what the MC is close to the surface. This might be OK in some cases, but will be trouble at other times.
The only true way to know for sure that a roughed bowl has stabilized the MC, is by recording monthly weighings. Normally, three months of unchanged weights is an indication of stabilization......but, that is subject to other things, so is not an absolute.
Denseness of the wood species, time of year, how controlled the environment where seasoning takes place......all these things will need to be taken into account, as well. My seasoning takes place in an uncontrolled environment (above 40oF up to around 90oF in the summer), so seasoning takes place more slowly during the winter months. Example: For a dense species, like Cocobolo, I might want to record a few more months of unchanged weights to be sure stabilization has actually occurred. This is especially true during the winter months.
My recommendations would be to get both a hand held moisture meter, and a scale. The combination of both, IMHO, when used to their specific advantages......gives the best results overall. :cool2:
ooc