• January Turning Challenge: Thin-Stemmed Something! (click here for details)
  • Conversations are now Direct Messages (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Scott Gordon for "Orb Ligneus" being selected as Turning of the Week for January 20, 2025 (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

Ellsworth versus negative raker

Emiliano Achaval

Administrator
Staff member
Beta Tester
TOTW Team
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
3,346
Likes
4,413
Location
Maui, Hawaii
Website
hawaiiankoaturner.com
I don't use scrapers, However a friend swears by his negative raker. I think I can do a better job with my Ellsworth gouge, including a final sheer scrape at the end. I have been turning for about 20 years, i used to use scrapers a lot, but thru out the years they kept staying on the tool rack more and more. What gives a better finish my Ellsworth gouge in my capable hands or a negative raker. Is it worth the buy?? Am I missing the point of this tool? Do I need it? This young English turner Lucas apparently likes it, anyone know why? Thank you in advance. Aloha.
 
Without a doubt a cutting tool with a sharp enough angle and sharp enough edge will beat out a scraper. A negative rake scraper held flat doesn't give me any better finish than a flat scraper with a fresh burr held as a shear scrape. The one advantage (or maybe 2) of the negative rake is that it applies very little forward pressure into the wood so a very gently cut on thin winged bowls is possible to get rid of chatter. I've been playing with using the bowl gouge with swept back wings with the flute up. This also gives very little pressure against the wood to help reduce chatter. I turn a lot of hand mirrors that often have swirly grain so your cutting against the grain. I've played with all sorts of grinds and scrapers and nothing I can find beats a really acute very sharp edge. My best tools for this are the Hunter carbide tools used as bevel rubbing cutting tools rather than scraping. They have an actual cutting edge of around 30 degrees and will give a very clean cut. It still requires a steady skilled hand to get a long clean cut with no lumps just like a bowl gouge. that's where I find the negative rake scraper or a good shear scraper such as the John Jordan scraper really come in. It's hard to get a totally clean curve from the middle out to the edge of a 5 1/2" mirror. You think it's perfect until you get the finish on and then you can see a little ripple somewhere. It's very subtle but definitely reflects light differently. So If I take a straight edge scraper and tilt it to about 45 degrees and pull it across I can get rid of those minor waves. It doesn't leave as clean a surface as a good cutting tool but it's easily sandable. So in my opinion there's more to it than just how clean a tool cuts. I like the negative rake scraper on the inside of bowls for the same reason. I can clean up those mild undulations caused by less than perfect tool control (and I'm talking mild most turners wouldn't even notice but I do and it irritates me). For newer turners the shear scraper is simply safer. Same is true for the Hunter Hercules and Osprey. Because the cutter is angled at 30 degrees it's a very safe tool to use. then if you rotate the tool about 45 degrees and use it as a bevel rubbing tool you get an extremely clean cut.
 
People skilled with gouges seldom need scrapers on bowls.
People skilled with scrapers seldom need gouges on bowls
People skilled with abrasive need neither a gouge or a scraper

On some very dense hardwood scrapers tend to work better than gouges.

When I turn bowls wider than deep I use an Ellsworth ground gouge and a spindle gouge for shaping the Chuck tenon, foot, and turning any beads etc.
Once in a while I get a little chatter in the bottom center inside on crotch bowls because the grain is running in different directions some fibers cut and others run over the tool edge and pull. I use a round nose scraper to clean these stubborn bottoms up. I try the gouge until I get concerned about making the bottom too thin then clean it up with the scraper.

The Negative rake scraper has an advantage on end grain. The end grain tends to climb onto the edge of a traditional scraper making a catch when used on the side wall of a bowl.
Negative rake scrapers work we'll on the side walls.
A regular scraper can be tamed and made much less aggressive when presented at an angle.
Negative rake scrapers tend to work well,on really thin wood but I'm more comfortable using the Ellsworth gouge or Michelson ground tool.

The Hunter carbides are wonderful, learning to use them better an more often is a goal of mine.
I used them on some natural edge goblet bowls and didn't even sand the inside.
 
Last edited:
"People skilled with gouges seldom need scrapers on bowls.
People skilled with scrapers seldom need gouges on bowls
People skilled with abrasive need neither a gouge or a scraper"

I would add:
"People with dull tools will become skilled with abrasives"
 
Hey, I'm on the west coast... Just commencing coffee infusion.... Plus I am a night owl. I was up in Salem last night to take in Ashley Harwood at the demo up there. I need to practice my 'dainty' skills....

Anyway, on bowls, and side grain turning, a shear angle cut will cut more clean surface than a scraping cut. On end grain, it is a different story where you are able to get comparable surfaces with either cut. So, scraper flat on the tool rest will leave more tear out. Negative rake scrapers are a whole different story, in part because, just raising the handle of a standard scraper way up in the air does not let it cut the same way that a negative rake scraper does. Most bowl turners want a big heavy scraper for sweeping across the bottom and slightly up the transition areas on the inside of a bowl. This is the most difficult part of the bowl to turn. Part is due to not being able to see the shape and surface as you cut like you can do on the outside. The other part is because we generally don't follow good body movement on that transition area (I have one video clip up about smoothing the inside curves). I have not used a negative rake scraper much. I have found that for the inside curves on bowls, it does work better on harder woods than it does on softer woods. On softer woods, it is about the same as a regular scraper (depending on sharpness and burr). A shear scrape is better. However, what exactly a shear scrape is differs a lot from turner to turner. I remember seeing several turners, Bill Grumbine was one, who did a 'shear scrape' on the inside walls of a bowl with a swept back grind gouge, with the gouge horizontal, and rolled over on the side. That to me is a scraping cut because the cutting edge is 90 degrees to the spin of the wood. Shear to me means at an angle to the spin, 45 degrees or more. The higher the shear angle, the more gently the cutting edge is at getting under the wood fiber and lifting it off. The lower the shear angle is, the more 'pull' there is on the fibers, so most of the time you will get more tear out. A scraping cut also will tear out more as you go down through the fiber, like down the side wall of a bowl. It tears less if you are sweeping back and forth across the bottom of the bowl, but some times some wood will just tear more. If it saves you time sanding, then use it, but keep working on gouge skills, and shear scraping skills.

I don't use the swept back gouges. I do use a 45/45 grind, and more standard nose shapes, and for finish cuts only. No practical use for my style of turning. I do all of my roughing with my scrapers. There is a thread about this over in the Newbie section about favorite roughing tool, and a link to my clip on turning a bowl with just scrapers. The wings on the swept back gouges are pretty good for shear scraping the outside of a bowl, but impossible to use properly on the inside of a bowl because you can't drop the handle to get the shear angle. I use scrapers for all of my shear scraping. Swept back, aka inside bowl scraper on the outside, and a ) nosed one on the inside. They are easy to roll up on the edges, once you round over the back side corners, to 70 or more degree angles. Also, you don't have to roll them over so far as you do the gouge flutes to get the cut. This improves visibility. Other than that, the burr you use makes a bid difference. I have been experimenting with 80 grit CBN, 180 grit CBN, honed, hand burnished, and now a 600 grit CBN burr. 80 grit CBN burr great for hogging out lots of material very fast, keeping a good edge for a long time, and gives a pretty good shear cut. 600 grit CBN burr, not so good for roughing, but excellent for shear scraping. Not a whole lot of difference with honed or burnished burrs, but both need some more experimenting... I hope to have a shear scraping video out later this year.

Jimmy Clewes commented at a demo that he does not like a bevel rubbed surface because it actually burnishes the wood surface, and when you start to sand, first thing you have to do is cut through the burnishing. That does have a good degree of fact, but depends in part on the turner. 'The bevel should rub the wood, but the wood should not know it' is a huge lesson we need to learn. Watching Ashley turn an ebony spindle that was about as thick as the bottom E string on my guitar with a bevel rubbing cut, and no support on the back side of the spindle really said 'Hippy, you got to practice your dainty skills'.

To date, to the best of my knowledge, no one has done a really comprehensive video or tutorial on negative rake scrapers. Best use I have found for them is for end grain box lids and bottoms. There is so much more that can be done...

I think the coffee has kicked in, off to Thai Chi class soon....

robo hippy
 
Lot's of good advice has been given. If you are getting the results you want then don't change. The negative rake scraper is useful in the arsenal but wait until someone is selling a scraper or two for cheap and then pick them up and grind them into negative rake.
 
I was up in Salem last night to take in Ashley Harwood at the demo up there. I need to practice my 'dainty' skills....

<snip>

I don't use the swept back gouges. I do use a 45/45 grind, and more standard nose shapes, and for finish cuts only.
robo hippy

I thought I had seen a familiar face in the crowd… just didn’t connect that it was you… it’s been quite a few years since you visited Northwest Woodturners in Portland.

What did you think of Ashley’s grind? (a 40°/40° straight wing on a V-gouge) She was quite good with that spaghetti-thin finial. I’m thinking about reshaping one of my gouges to check it out.
 
I thought I had seen a familiar face in the crowd… just didn’t connect that it was you… it’s been quite a few years since you visited Northwest Woodturners in Portland. What did you think of Ashley’s grind? (a 40°/40° straight wing on a V-gouge) She was quite good with that spaghetti-thin finial. I’m thinking about reshaping one of my gouges to check it out.

We have several l Florida turners using the 40/40 part of the time.

It is a grind Stewart Batty has been advocating for quite a while. Ashley Harwood and Cindy Drozda are two popular turners using it.

At 40 degrees the nose is a bit sharper than the 60 degree Ellsworth nose.
I believe the wings of the Ellsworth are a bit sharper.

It under cuts the rim of a bowl better than the Ellsworth.
I haven't tried it on a shear cut but it does have much leading edge on the wing like the Ellsworth.

Let us know what you think of it when you try it.
 
Well, I was out in the shop practicing my dainty turning today. I still have some Mountain Mahogany, and after practicing on a piece of dogwood, put the MM on. I was able to achieve satisfactory results, but it took a long time. 10,000 more times maybe. Biggest problem is being able to 'see' the shape in my mind, then being able to get the wood to that shape. Way more curves than on my bowls.

Of course, when going dainty, I was using smaller than normal tools, well for me anyway, and tried out some others as well. Ashley prefers a 1/2 inch parabolic fluted gouge with the 40/40. I have Thompson V and U gouges, and an old Craft Supplies standard gouge that I was using. I didn't bring out one of the D Way gouges that I have though. I started with them at 45/45, and they work. I went to 40/40, and they work also, though I can't say if they work better. I would compare them more to a detail gouge than to a bowl gouge, and you use the wings for a lot of the cutting, but when I turn bowls, I use the nose for the finish cut. This is also spindle turning compared to bowl turning. I couldn't make cuts on the end of a 6 inch spindle without finger support, which Ashley could (10,000 more times...). This is where 'the bevel should rub the wood, but the wood should not know it' is huge, and if you can be really sensitive to tool pressure, then you do without the finger support. Farther down the spindle, I could. Much more play time is needed. I do think the 40/40 works better on a more open flute than a V, mostly because the nose is too pointy in a V, and a bit more rounded with a U. I would like to play with one of her gouges that she has sharpened, or have a chance to see them side by side to compare. How far you roll the flutes when sharpening can make a big difference. Like all demonstrations, I hope I can remember most of it by the time I get back out to the shop to play. I did pick up her video, and will review it a couple of times. I do have a fluteless gouge that is ground like a detail gouge, some thing I saw that Alan Batty had and used for details, beads, and coves. I used it a lot. Compared to the Vortex tool, mine has a more rounded nose, and the Vortex is pointed. I wouldn't use a Sorby Spindle Master on one of these, though it could be done. The fluteless gouge is easier to use and figure out.

As for which works better for under cutting the rim of a bowl, I am taking that to be a calabash type style where the rim curves back inside the bowl. I can make that cut with my BOB (bottom of bowl) tools, which generally have a more rounded nose than an Ellsworth type grind. What makes it more difficult with the 60 degree bevel compared to the 40 degree bevel is how you have to position the handle to make the cut. With a 60 degree bevel, the handle would have to be almost parallel to the rim of the bowl to get the bevel rub.

Now, I need to get Ashley to use one of my robo rests....

Owen, hey now, there is only one robo hippy.... If your club gets a tree, let me know and I can bring my Chainsaw Chopsaw (google it or on You Tube) up and we can make a mess.... I believe Ashley is up there for a day or two. I could do bowl turning again since it has been a while. Working on a few other things to demo, most of what I try to teach is tool technique.

robo hippy
 
Scrapers

Personally, I just use a rock or sharp piece of glass.

Another smart ache once told me, "Use a hammer if it gives you the desired results."
 
Back
Top