• Congratulations to Alex Bradley winner of the December 2024 Turning Challenge (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Kris DeVault for "Tri-Corner Trifecta Bowl" being selected as Turning of the Week for December 30, 2024 (click here for details)
  • Conversations are now Direct Messages (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

Bob Stockdale, inflation and tool development

Joined
Feb 3, 2010
Messages
505
Likes
609
Location
Adelaide Hills, Australia
Someone recently gave me copies of the three compendiums of Fine WoodWorking Techniques (1 to 3) published by Taunton press back in the late 1970s. They were a selection of articles from the early editions of Fine WoodWorking magazine. I never got any copies of that magazine back then as I was elbow deep in clay at the time, although I had been a woodturner before that. So, it was fascinating to read an article in the 1st compendium (p.22) that was written by Bob Stockdale in the mid 1970s.

Three things struck me about his article: his tools, his techniques and his prices

His prices

His article included black and white photos of 22 of his bowls that were turned from exotic woods. Each piece has a write up about the species, where it came from and how it turned, but also included are the dimensions and selling price for each piece. The prices ranged from $35 for a 11" Wenge platter up to $350 for a 10" Cocobolo bowl. That last piece was on the cover of that edition of the compendium. To get some perspective on those prices, the rate of inflation since the mid 1970s makes US$1 worth US$5.86 now. So, if he was selling now at the same stage of his career his cheapest pieces would be selling for $200 and his most expensive piece for $2,050. Taking into account the cost of exotic woods that Bob was using, are our prices keeping up with inflation?

His techniques

His techniques include centre screws or faceplates for mounting the blank to turn the outside of bowls and 'trays' and then for turning the inside of the bowls holding the foot in a three-jaw geared chuck and for the trays glued to a mounting block. I remember those limitations very well and, although some still do things that way (I still mount small to medium blanks on a screw), I for one extoll the subsequent developments in chucks that has made turning so much more versatile and easy. So, I do admire what he could achieve within those limitations.

His tools

At the time of writing the article Stockdale was using just two sizes of traditional shallow spindle gouges (1" & 1/2") to do all of his bowl and platter turning. That was also what I had to use myself back then and we referred to them as continental gouges. In the article he describes how he grinds the corners well back to create a "half-oval" shape on the tip and uses them with a "shearing cut". He then refers to the long-and-strong gouges that Peter Child had developed about that time and says he doesn't use it "because I don't need all of that metal" as he puts very little strain on his turning tool. This is an interesting snapshot from that stage in turning tool development before Stockdale's collaboration with Jerry Glaser that brought us the next significant development after Peter Child's initial work (well, actually Roy Child's work) in improving and giving us the modern bowl gouge. I was oblivious to all of this at the time but having lived with the limitations of continental gouges and scrapers back then I can't image not having the great bowl gouge designs and steels that we now have!

PS - I could have included some selected scans from the article, but not being familiar with fair dealings under US copyright law I erred on the side of caution.
 
What amazed when I got back into wood turning, was how long some of the technolgy took to works its way into turning. Ie chucks, HSS , Carbide cutter and the welded lathe out of RHS and SHS that is square or rectangular tube. That aspect sadly seemed to be driven by economics and so quality was sadly lacking. Later in North America we had really good designs in the welded format that continue to this day.
But in comment to post I remember well face plates and high carbon steels and the issues I had as a youngster with hollowing old hardwood fence posts , well trying to and after one spectacular failure I walked away from turning for many years. Drawn away by the lure of travel, not to mention sex drugs n rockin' roll, are the halcyon days of youth. 🙂
 
Last edited:
I remember well face plates and high carbon steels and the issues I had as a youngster with hollowing old hardwood fence posts , well trying to and after one spectacular failure I walked away from turning for many years. Drawn away by the lure of travel, not to mention sex drugs n rockin' roll, are the halcyon days of youth. 🙂

I guess most of us had our halcyon days of youth to reflect back on.... and the further they are away the more fondly we remember them... 😎

I've kept one of my high carbon steel bowl gouge to remind me how good it is to have the modern exotic steels and carbides. Not that I keep that high carbon steel gouge in my tool rack, but occasionally I get it out of a bottom drawer and remind myself how keen its edge can be made and just how briefly that lasts!

So, its impressive to look back and see how much Bob Stockdale achieved with those high carbon steel gouges which is all we had back then. I also understand why he was comfortable with his "shearing cut" style of turning, which is more forgiving on a high carbon steel edge. The way most of us turn now with our push cuts would be far more punishing on a plain high carbon steel edge.

However, at the time of writing that article for Fine Woodworking, Bob Stockdale was proposing that the shallow style of continental spindle gouges that he was using to turn his bowls using his shearing cut be made thinner than those that were available from tool suppliers. He wrote in the article... "I'd like to get some gouges made of steel that is only 1/8-inch thick". What Bob was unable to see at that time was that the deep flute redesign that Roy Child gave us had the potential to do the type of shearing cuts he was using, but on the swept back wings on the deep flute design, and that it took David Ellsworth to realise and develop that innovation.

The lesson from this for me is to be always open to other ways of doing things and not be locked into what I'm comfortable with.
 
Back
Top