- Joined
- Nov 17, 2007
- Messages
- 7
- Likes
- 0
When I first started turning in the eighties, whenever I had the need to purchase wood, I was charged by the board foot. Now when I need to purchase wood (usually from the logger or mill), they want to charge by weight. I dislike being asked to buy wood by weight as I always conclude I'm paying more than I should especially if the logs have been freshly cut with a high moisture content. In reality, the difference in weight between a chunk of maple burl a week after it's been cut versus six months after it's been cut may not effect the price significantly but it irks me. What's the wrong with using board foot as our standard measure?
How do others feel about paying for wood by weight? I apologize if this has been discussed recently but I haven't seen any postings on this topic.
How do others feel about paying for wood by weight? I apologize if this has been discussed recently but I haven't seen any postings on this topic.