Congratulations to Ted Pelfrey for "Forest Floor" being selected as Turning of the Week for November 4, 2024
(click here for details)
Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.
I like the form of the top and the lower form (foot/base), Doug ...... but not together. It looks disjointed to me. Maybe if the line was continuous ... ??? Just my 2¢! Others MMV.
The finish and the wood are beautiful and the detailed foot is very nice.
I like the form of the top and the lower form (foot/base), Doug ...... but not together. It looks disjointed to me. Maybe if the line was continuous ... ??? Just my 2¢! Others MMV.
The finish and the wood are beautiful and the detailed foot is very nice.
Appreciate the input Tom. To clarify, are you talking about the transition from the bottom up to the "globe" portion, where the transition gets a bit sharp? And your suggestion is a more gradual transition?
I like the form of the top and the lower form (foot/base), Doug ...... but not together. It looks disjointed to me. Maybe if the line was continuous ... ??? Just my 2¢! Others MMV.
The finish and the wood are beautiful and the detailed foot is very nice.
Appreciate the input Tom. To clarify, are you talking about the transition from the bottom up to the "globe" portion, where the transition gets a bit sharp? And your suggestion is a more gradual transition?
Yes and yes. And perhaps, to extend the lower curve of the upper form (making it taller) - I think that is what Russ was referring to. Or even make it a stand-alone form - no pedestal needed. Of course, then you would have to hollow a little deeper!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.